ptolia
07-28 09:22 AM
Just wanted to update the guys on this thread:
Received CPO email for EAD's today. So it took them only 3 weeks since I responded to the RFE...not bad at all.
Which service center?
Received CPO email for EAD's today. So it took them only 3 weeks since I responded to the RFE...not bad at all.
Which service center?
wallpaper long haircut styles with side
ItIsNotFunny
03-30 08:44 AM
The normal practice is, take a letterhead from the company and then get your collegue or manager to sign it. Believe me, 100% people do that. If you have offer letters etc... from your company, scan the letter and use photoshop to create a letterhead and write your own stuff, if for some reason your collegues are scared to sign any document (which happened in my case), get it from someone who was working in that company and left the company. If that also does not work out, just get a friend to sign it.
The reference letter need not actually be on the company letterhead, your friend can use his present company letterhead or the letter need not be on the letterhead, it can be on a regular paper that is notarized.
Well I would take this as last resource. It is your legal right as per US law to get experience letter from your employer. Good relation with HR can make the issue smooth. If nothing works, above is the solution :)
The reference letter need not actually be on the company letterhead, your friend can use his present company letterhead or the letter need not be on the letterhead, it can be on a regular paper that is notarized.
Well I would take this as last resource. It is your legal right as per US law to get experience letter from your employer. Good relation with HR can make the issue smooth. If nothing works, above is the solution :)
dixie
06-27 08:39 PM
Just wait for your GC, then start looking for another job and see how it goes. One of my friend thought of leaving his employer the day he got his GC. Guess what, its been almost a year and he is still with the same employer. His employer (Desi consultancy) increased his pay soon after his GC. So just wait till you get your GC and then decide which way to go.
Its risky to quit your job the day after you get a GC. USCIS can revoke the GC saying you never intended to be remain employed at your LC advertised position. The burden is then on you to prove otherwise.Most attorneys advise staying put for a minimum of six months to be on the safe side.
Its risky to quit your job the day after you get a GC. USCIS can revoke the GC saying you never intended to be remain employed at your LC advertised position. The burden is then on you to prove otherwise.Most attorneys advise staying put for a minimum of six months to be on the safe side.
2011 layered hairstyles for long
pasyam
02-17 07:13 PM
I would appreciate if someone sends me a list of recruiters in the IT Programming area? I am in the South and Central Texas region
more...
DanontheMoon
08-11 06:44 PM
His name is Raaaallllph..
zCool
03-02 12:11 PM
To all those who are contemplating this...
1. Pick 1 country, and stick to it, Both US and canada forbid folks who take up/apply PR and not fullfil residency obligations, There was a period from 2000 to 2003-4 when Canadians went easy on folks saying they are only working in US. Lately they are catching and weeding out folks at citizenship time. So it's not easy at all to play both systems.
More importantly, USA laws explicitely prohibit folks from showing/doing anything that can be construed as "intent to abandon" 485. AND YES application/landing/visit to Canada for PR related stuff CAN BE construed as you are not serious abt settling down in US. So trade carefully..
2. Canadian job market is very hard on new immigrant so much so there are entire sites on internet that warn new immigrants to Canada about hurdles and trials.
3. US retrogression may go on for years so those who don't want to wait , should just give up 485.. And go stay in Canada. things aren't that bad once you've beeen there for couple for yrs.
1. Pick 1 country, and stick to it, Both US and canada forbid folks who take up/apply PR and not fullfil residency obligations, There was a period from 2000 to 2003-4 when Canadians went easy on folks saying they are only working in US. Lately they are catching and weeding out folks at citizenship time. So it's not easy at all to play both systems.
More importantly, USA laws explicitely prohibit folks from showing/doing anything that can be construed as "intent to abandon" 485. AND YES application/landing/visit to Canada for PR related stuff CAN BE construed as you are not serious abt settling down in US. So trade carefully..
2. Canadian job market is very hard on new immigrant so much so there are entire sites on internet that warn new immigrants to Canada about hurdles and trials.
3. US retrogression may go on for years so those who don't want to wait , should just give up 485.. And go stay in Canada. things aren't that bad once you've beeen there for couple for yrs.
more...
Aah_GC
08-01 12:46 PM
Typical Murthy Style -
Your comments are appreciated and in doing so the law offices of Sheila Murthy have left no stone unturned to deliberate a discussion with USCIS. We understand how important this is to our readers and are striving hard to get some information.
Few days later..
The recent bulletin has left a lot of our readers in the line, waiting for their Green cards. What now? We have to remind our readers that they could apply for their AC21 portability clause. What is AC21 clause?
Few years later.. (after IV and other pro immig groups have solved the issues)
We have good news for our readers. Sheila Murthy's efforts have led to a resolution that will sound pleasing to its readers. What now?
.............
and a whole lot of bull crap.. Welcome to the never ending series of self-advertizement.
Your comments are appreciated and in doing so the law offices of Sheila Murthy have left no stone unturned to deliberate a discussion with USCIS. We understand how important this is to our readers and are striving hard to get some information.
Few days later..
The recent bulletin has left a lot of our readers in the line, waiting for their Green cards. What now? We have to remind our readers that they could apply for their AC21 portability clause. What is AC21 clause?
Few years later.. (after IV and other pro immig groups have solved the issues)
We have good news for our readers. Sheila Murthy's efforts have led to a resolution that will sound pleasing to its readers. What now?
.............
and a whole lot of bull crap.. Welcome to the never ending series of self-advertizement.
2010 long side fringe hairstyles.
gondalguru
07-24 07:17 PM
If USPS can not deliver the mail it is returned to the sender. Plus USPS does have a very good track record and very very very few mails get lost.
Most likely your mail had reached its destination.
I do think that filing the second package is a good idea. But for peace of mind you can do it.
Ask you lawyer about his opinion. Follow his advise. If he says its sent and no need to file again then I think you need to believe him and wait for the receipt notice.
Most likely your mail had reached its destination.
I do think that filing the second package is a good idea. But for peace of mind you can do it.
Ask you lawyer about his opinion. Follow his advise. If he says its sent and no need to file again then I think you need to believe him and wait for the receipt notice.
more...
Adam
08-12 08:46 PM
I know there is already a hockey smilie, but this one's a player and the other one is a goalie :P
hockeyplayer
bacon & eggs
steak
mac
I'm outta here!
hockeyplayer
bacon & eggs
steak
mac
I'm outta here!
hair There are many hairstyles
vkannan
05-08 06:07 PM
To me its good news atleast for EB2 I guys (Certainly my heart goes out to Poor EB3 souls).....reason-> atleast they did not move it to 'U' and it gives a indication that they have some visas left in general quota and they are counting on spill overs....I will not be surprised if they move it past to 2006 come August/September.....time and again....this VB clearly says one thing....USCIS does not have a damn clue of how many cases are pending......and yeah all those memos stating pending I485 #s are S@$%.......
more...
Openarms
03-01 04:47 PM
I mailed on Feb 7 and they received on Feb 9. Based on above responses, I might need to wait atleast another week.
Thanks to all for sharing the info.
Hi sguntaka,
Did you happen to get your's yet? I have not recieved yet either. Is there anyway to contact them???
Thanks to all for sharing the info.
Hi sguntaka,
Did you happen to get your's yet? I have not recieved yet either. Is there anyway to contact them???
hot Hairstyles with Side Bangs
eilsoe
10-02 07:59 PM
check yer e-mail...
I'm gonna go get me a midnight snack....
I'm gonna go get me a midnight snack....
more...
house Hairstyles With Side Swept
blacktongue
05-11 12:52 PM
why do you think illegal kids suffer more? Isn't getting a visa stamped suffering these days? The whole argument about "parents made a mistake and why do you want kids to suffer" is a total BS i think. It is parents choice and parents know better about their kids.
btw try to work on your writing skills a bit
Visa stamping no problem. 1 time in 3 years. If document good no problem.
Illegals problems are everyday life. Fear always. Expolitation. Poverty. Human rights. Education health care etc. You no idea. Try live like them a day and you know. You rich guy cannot understand.
btw try to work on your writing skills a bit
Visa stamping no problem. 1 time in 3 years. If document good no problem.
Illegals problems are everyday life. Fear always. Expolitation. Poverty. Human rights. Education health care etc. You no idea. Try live like them a day and you know. You rich guy cannot understand.
tattoo long haircut styles with side
ItIsNotFunny
09-22 01:04 PM
Hey Buddy,
How come you have s-corp registered, when you do not have green card.
The rule for s-corp is to be a greencard or US citizen right...correct me if I am wrong.
Not true! I have S-Corporation without GC. Actually you don't need even filed GC to start S-Corp, all you need is social.
How come you have s-corp registered, when you do not have green card.
The rule for s-corp is to be a greencard or US citizen right...correct me if I am wrong.
Not true! I have S-Corporation without GC. Actually you don't need even filed GC to start S-Corp, all you need is social.
more...
pictures hairstyles with side bangs
dallasdude
05-07 01:58 PM
Hi
Just curious why do you want to have the delivery in India? If the baby is born outside USA he/she wouldnt get the USA citizenship isnt it?
It's a personal choice. Lot of people prefer to have citizenship from their home land, so that they can have a vote in politics.
Just curious why do you want to have the delivery in India? If the baby is born outside USA he/she wouldnt get the USA citizenship isnt it?
It's a personal choice. Lot of people prefer to have citizenship from their home land, so that they can have a vote in politics.
dresses long hairstyles with side
intheyan
09-21 12:05 AM
Add me in your Queue
more...
makeup angs hairstyles Long
Karthikthiru
08-15 07:15 PM
call1 : 08/13/08
IO told me that my name check is not clear.
call2:08/15/08
IO told that my name check is clear. But now she says my priority date as 08/31/2007 ( Which is basically the Notice date) and said as my priority date is not current it cannot be processed now.
My PD is 01/2006. Case transferred from NSC to TSC.
FYI - what is the PD on your approval notice of I-140. The reason why I am saying that they also had my PD incorrectly on my approval notice of my I-140. I just got it changed three weeks back. This is serious - sometimes USCIS assigns the ND/RD as the PD which is an issue. Hust double check it
IO told me that my name check is not clear.
call2:08/15/08
IO told that my name check is clear. But now she says my priority date as 08/31/2007 ( Which is basically the Notice date) and said as my priority date is not current it cannot be processed now.
My PD is 01/2006. Case transferred from NSC to TSC.
FYI - what is the PD on your approval notice of I-140. The reason why I am saying that they also had my PD incorrectly on my approval notice of my I-140. I just got it changed three weeks back. This is serious - sometimes USCIS assigns the ND/RD as the PD which is an issue. Hust double check it
girlfriend by side swept angs or a
japs19
02-25 02:50 PM
My POE was LA and CBP officer did ask me that question.
My situation was I did not work for the original petitioner at that time.
If they don't ask, you don't tell. If they do then be honest. I told them that I do not work for original petitioner and the officer said that is fraud. You must be working for them. I politely told them that Employment Based GC is for future employment and I don't have to be working for them.
I was held hostage for 6 hours and was told to go to downtown office where they stamped AP.
The thing is there is no such laws which restricts you to be working for any employers as long as in good faith you can say that your intentions are to go and work for the petitioner employer. Although things can change along the way and anyone can utilize AC-21 rule and change jobs. It is just that it would serve as a faithful relationship if an employee is working for original petitioner so there is no ifs and buts about the employer-employee relationship after several years as it may take them forever to process I-485.
I have read here that the IO at the POE Does ask if you are still working for the
Sponsoring Employer.
I would like to know how to handle this situation if anybody has Travelled on AP
after Invoking AC21 and changing the GC Sponsoring Employer.
Any 1 in this Situation Please Post your Experience
My situation was I did not work for the original petitioner at that time.
If they don't ask, you don't tell. If they do then be honest. I told them that I do not work for original petitioner and the officer said that is fraud. You must be working for them. I politely told them that Employment Based GC is for future employment and I don't have to be working for them.
I was held hostage for 6 hours and was told to go to downtown office where they stamped AP.
The thing is there is no such laws which restricts you to be working for any employers as long as in good faith you can say that your intentions are to go and work for the petitioner employer. Although things can change along the way and anyone can utilize AC-21 rule and change jobs. It is just that it would serve as a faithful relationship if an employee is working for original petitioner so there is no ifs and buts about the employer-employee relationship after several years as it may take them forever to process I-485.
I have read here that the IO at the POE Does ask if you are still working for the
Sponsoring Employer.
I would like to know how to handle this situation if anybody has Travelled on AP
after Invoking AC21 and changing the GC Sponsoring Employer.
Any 1 in this Situation Please Post your Experience
hairstyles wallpaper Long Hairstyles Side
kkking
09-26 02:24 PM
Recieved by Fisher on 20th July. Nothing after that. Called the customer support and reached IO. Nothing in the system yet.....
venky08
09-18 05:10 PM
:D:D
veny08 fact is there is green card lottery system
-> and the joke is that they are drawing names from a hat in DC :D
veny08 fact is there is green card lottery system
-> and the joke is that they are drawing names from a hat in DC :D
Student with no hopes
04-23 02:10 PM
I have a Ph.D. in Mech Engg from Top 15 univ, 3 Journal Papers, 6 international conference publications, 15 citations, and a full time job with a great employer. But the employer can't sponsor EB1-OR as there is no research involved. How pathetic are the rules for EB-1? ...just venting!
If you have a phd, is it automatically EB1? or do the rules of employment should call for phd apply?
I had asked that question in the ask the attorney section, and i guess the above post answers my question.
If you have a phd, is it automatically EB1? or do the rules of employment should call for phd apply?
I had asked that question in the ask the attorney section, and i guess the above post answers my question.
No comments:
Post a Comment