Angelo95210
Mar 31, 03:53 AM
Check for poorman steadycam on Google. You can build one for $19, pretty effective actually.
Germwise
May 2, 08:47 PM
I did what parapup suggested.
I went with OWC with their data doubler combo which was the 128SSD (115 usable) with the optibay for 279. I then bought the optical drive housing for 24 from max upgrades total around 310.
Its about what I wanted to spend and hopefully I'll only use the HD for data storage.
Stupid question, will the OSX install disc boot from the external drive or do I need to replace my main HD, then install osx, then replace the optical drive?
also, time machine will have no trouble right?
THANKS for all your help guys
I went with OWC with their data doubler combo which was the 128SSD (115 usable) with the optibay for 279. I then bought the optical drive housing for 24 from max upgrades total around 310.
Its about what I wanted to spend and hopefully I'll only use the HD for data storage.
Stupid question, will the OSX install disc boot from the external drive or do I need to replace my main HD, then install osx, then replace the optical drive?
also, time machine will have no trouble right?
THANKS for all your help guys
arn
Jun 12, 01:23 AM
This has to be the least hyped(and cared about) keynote since steve jobs returned to Apple. I didnt even know when it was going to be until I read on a videogame website that there was this 3d game for the new iphone.
....
Apple computers and software is not bad, its just being neglected. I am afraid that Apple is no longer creating great computers that beat out other pc's. They are halting that, and concentrating on entertainment(movies & music) and other gadgets...iphone,ipod, apple tv, airport...etc.
1. I disagree. I think this keynote was very hyped, one of the most talked about before hand. Traffic/interest at the site during the keynote was the highest ever.
2. I think what we've heard about Snow Leopard is exactly the direction Apple should be going. More substance, than style. Some people might have been happier if Apple devoted time on a flashy new interface for 10.6, but in the long run, we are going to benefit much more with the kind of performance enhancements they have described.
arn
....
Apple computers and software is not bad, its just being neglected. I am afraid that Apple is no longer creating great computers that beat out other pc's. They are halting that, and concentrating on entertainment(movies & music) and other gadgets...iphone,ipod, apple tv, airport...etc.
1. I disagree. I think this keynote was very hyped, one of the most talked about before hand. Traffic/interest at the site during the keynote was the highest ever.
2. I think what we've heard about Snow Leopard is exactly the direction Apple should be going. More substance, than style. Some people might have been happier if Apple devoted time on a flashy new interface for 10.6, but in the long run, we are going to benefit much more with the kind of performance enhancements they have described.
arn
whitedragon101
Feb 19, 06:46 PM
I shall now respond with the only sane reply to this question.
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha, he he he he gaphaw, wheeze snort aha aha a
a a ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha, he he he he gaphaw, wheeze snort aha aha a
a a ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
davidjearly
Jan 17, 06:23 AM
The hat was just folded in half so people wouldn't have to actually put it on, and could just hold it up.
arn
I eat my words then. :o
Looking at the site, it is actually not too bad looking. Well, for use on flights etc...
arn
I eat my words then. :o
Looking at the site, it is actually not too bad looking. Well, for use on flights etc...
besler3035
Jan 16, 06:33 PM
When I enter iPhoto, I usually notice that the font is noticably bigger in the Source area than it is in iTunes. Basically, it looks like the exact same size as in iCal's Calendar area. It IS NOT the Large size, but is in-between the small and large size.
I have tried changing the source size and it works until I close it. When I start iPhoto back up again, it goes back to the bigger size. Is there anyway I can stop this from happening, or is this just a common bug with iPhoto?
I have tried changing the source size and it works until I close it. When I start iPhoto back up again, it goes back to the bigger size. Is there anyway I can stop this from happening, or is this just a common bug with iPhoto?
Sykte
Apr 19, 05:22 PM
[UIView animateWithDuration:0.8 delay:0.0 options: UIViewAnimationTransitionFlipFromLeft animations:^ { popContents.view.frame = CGRectMake(160, 70, 350, 350);
[self.view.superview bringSubviewToFront:self.view];
[self.view.superview addSubview:popContents.view]; }
completion: ^(BOOL finished) {
NSLog(@"DONE");
}
];
UIViewAnimationTransitionFlipFromLeft
This isn't a UIViewAnimationOption, what happens when you sub in the following.
UIViewAnimationOptionTransitionFlipFromLeft
[self.view.superview bringSubviewToFront:self.view];
[self.view.superview addSubview:popContents.view]; }
completion: ^(BOOL finished) {
NSLog(@"DONE");
}
];
UIViewAnimationTransitionFlipFromLeft
This isn't a UIViewAnimationOption, what happens when you sub in the following.
UIViewAnimationOptionTransitionFlipFromLeft
claud9999
Aug 3, 11:40 AM
YESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
E-PL1 support finally. :D
Agreed. I've been using the "Olympus Master 2" software with my E-PL1's RAW files and it's ssssslllllooooowwwww (like 20s to display a pic in 1:1 resolution). Wondering if iPhoto's RAW handling is significantly faster than the Olympus s/w.
Been holding off on upgrading from iPhoto '08 -> '09 in the hopes that '10 will come out soon....................soon?
E-PL1 support finally. :D
Agreed. I've been using the "Olympus Master 2" software with my E-PL1's RAW files and it's ssssslllllooooowwwww (like 20s to display a pic in 1:1 resolution). Wondering if iPhoto's RAW handling is significantly faster than the Olympus s/w.
Been holding off on upgrading from iPhoto '08 -> '09 in the hopes that '10 will come out soon....................soon?
arcrius
Apr 9, 09:18 PM
i get error code 1604
Ahh! I forgot a step! :eek: I just edited it though. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Ahh! I forgot a step! :eek: I just edited it though. Sorry for the inconvenience.
wpotere
Apr 25, 07:35 PM
Even *if* your friend paid for it, it's not his to give you to install and use without violating Apple's license agreement
^^^ This...
^^^ This...
dubels
Dec 24, 11:45 PM
http://www.timeidol.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Jack-Daniels-1.jpg
md63
Mar 14, 01:42 PM
I have three letters for you.... DRM.
The Netflix app is very well protected.
They do this to prevent stream recording/capture.
I have a fairly old flat LCD TV. Is that is what is causing the problem? If I use a new TV would that solve the issue?
The Netflix app is very well protected.
They do this to prevent stream recording/capture.
I have a fairly old flat LCD TV. Is that is what is causing the problem? If I use a new TV would that solve the issue?
eyelikeart
Oct 15, 02:49 PM
she's just living her life...outside of MR... ;)
right now she's in Atlanta getting a dog :D
right now she's in Atlanta getting a dog :D
chille
Apr 30, 10:27 AM
Since the update, my iChat doesn't display my contacts names from Facebook anymore, just their numeric ID.
Anyone who has a clue how to fix this?
Anyone who has a clue how to fix this?
Isoparm
Mar 9, 12:30 PM
No, see that's the problem. I can't figure out how to forward request to IP #2 to the server on the alternate ports.
It always goes to the server on port 80 (apache).
What I need to figure out is how to get the request on that 2nd IP to forward to the alternate ports (where the ruby server is running).
It always goes to the server on port 80 (apache).
What I need to figure out is how to get the request on that 2nd IP to forward to the alternate ports (where the ruby server is running).
maya
Sep 24, 10:58 AM
The creepy stench of a Cult welcome. :eek: ;) :p :D
Hope everyone is Happy with they Mac. :)
Hope everyone is Happy with they Mac. :)
Rod Rod
Oct 5, 01:15 PM
heh. lack of user support? more like too much support from the warez community... ;) http://mugget.com/web_images/twisted.gif
if you dont' know what really happened to it, dig up the whole story, very interesting, amusing and scary all at the same time. :eek: :D
it's probably unrealistic to expect a product that has massive appeal to the warez types not to be cracked and then freely distributed.
do you have any links to "the whole story"? I did some Google digging and I didn't get anywhere. thanks.
if you dont' know what really happened to it, dig up the whole story, very interesting, amusing and scary all at the same time. :eek: :D
it's probably unrealistic to expect a product that has massive appeal to the warez types not to be cracked and then freely distributed.
do you have any links to "the whole story"? I did some Google digging and I didn't get anywhere. thanks.
philipma1957
Apr 24, 10:00 AM
When I look at the depreciation of MBP, it is much worse than a MP. For example, 2008 models of MP have depreciated by about ~50%, while MBP have depreciated ~75% for similar price starting price point of the computers.
stick people holding hands
mischief
Feb 14, 08:25 PM
YOU WILL BUY A MUG NOW!!! NOW!!NOW!!NOW!!NOW!!:D :eek: :cool: :rolleyes: :p ;)
trainguy77
Apr 3, 11:50 AM
XP also will freek out if it has no video card. I once got a certain BIOS to go on with no video card but XP shot that idea down really fast.
zimv20
Jul 8, 01:55 PM
okay, i think this is it.
i cannot browse below ~/Documents by going to 127.0.0.1/~zim. but i can browse freely by going to 127.0.0.1.
dunno what the deal is, but at least i have a solution. and what i said above about ditching the link at /Library/WebServer/Documents/Documents should be ignored. it's needed.
wasn't this fun? :-)
i cannot browse below ~/Documents by going to 127.0.0.1/~zim. but i can browse freely by going to 127.0.0.1.
dunno what the deal is, but at least i have a solution. and what i said above about ditching the link at /Library/WebServer/Documents/Documents should be ignored. it's needed.
wasn't this fun? :-)
greatdevourer
Apr 5, 02:29 PM
Um... what do they mean "add" Easy. I'm pretty sure my Cube version has it :confused: (you start with the shotgun)
David Schmidt
Oct 21, 01:27 PM
On a side note I think it's funny that Mac OS 10.6 is not actually 11 or 12. As the difference between 10.0 and 10.6 is far greater than 7.6 to 8 or 8.6 to 9.
I think the opportunity to renumber was back in the 10.4 or 10.5 range. 10.6 was little more than a performance tweak. But little by little, we drift farther and farther away from that 10.0 experience. Maybe Lion, with more touchiness, will warrant a new number. But "XI" just doesn't look as cool as "X" does.
I think the opportunity to renumber was back in the 10.4 or 10.5 range. 10.6 was little more than a performance tweak. But little by little, we drift farther and farther away from that 10.0 experience. Maybe Lion, with more touchiness, will warrant a new number. But "XI" just doesn't look as cool as "X" does.
babybanana
Apr 27, 03:38 PM
You can use almost anything with a tripod for landscapes, and add in AutoPano Pro if you want to stitch. Macro is a different beast- insects or static subjects? The Tamron 90mm SP Di is a great choice as is the Nikon 105mm, consider the Sigma 150mm macro if you need the working distance.
Paul
Thanks for the swift reply :)
I tend to do static objects mostly but will occasionally take pictures of the odd insects. But to be honest, I'm not looking for lenses for that until next year when I get some more money. I think that currently I'll be looking lens for landscape for now. Will definitely use pano pro in the future. Been looking at things like that for a while now.
Paul
Thanks for the swift reply :)
I tend to do static objects mostly but will occasionally take pictures of the odd insects. But to be honest, I'm not looking for lenses for that until next year when I get some more money. I think that currently I'll be looking lens for landscape for now. Will definitely use pano pro in the future. Been looking at things like that for a while now.
No comments:
Post a Comment